Should movies ever exceed a trilogy?

should movies ever exceed a trilogy? the first 2 usually are good but the thrd one is the least of the three





Spider-man 3, X-Men Last Stand, Return of the Jedi (Bloody Ewoks killed it, not a bad film but still episode's IV %26amp; V were better), Blade Trinity, Pirates of the Carribean:Worlds end, Shrek 3.





And making sequels after that, Indiana Jones 4, Star Wars Prequel Trilogy. Infinite Movies Like Star Trek, James BondShould movies ever exceed a trilogy?
No 3 films are quite enough any more %26amp; they just get boring like the Star Wars films.





Good luck.X :-)Should movies ever exceed a trilogy?
God NOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....the third tanks like a brick doesn't matter which franchise it comes from.....I was disappointed by the 3rd Matrix movie I was so very upset...leaving the movie theatre, all I kept saying was ';that's it I could've written this garbage movie much better than what I witnessed on screen.';
idk. sometimes. a third movie can suck.


but then again. if the story line is good enuff


to keep you interested throughout all the movies.


then i say go for it.


it will deff entertain someone...
Yes


Also the 4 movies Alien, Aliens, Alien 3, Alien resurrection
It depends. Personally i think 3 films are generally enough to tell any story. Unless they are to be adapted from books and are remaining faithful, in that case it only makes sense
Yeah, Halloween is an excellent example. The first two were fantastic, but the last 4-5 were sub-par...
well the only one i like is saw.. the other ones sucks to me... i usually hate sequels..





cnt wait for saw V oct.24th!!!
If each one is good every time. Like all the Pirates of the Carribean.
The Lords of the Rings is a trilogy, and a good one too!
Good point but it depends on the story. They've got to finish it. Harry Potter is an example.