Oh my holy fcuk. lol Don't ever insult Lord of the Rings like that ever!
That's like Star Wars vs Star Trek.
There is no comparison, in book or film form. Not that Prince Caspian and all that series isn't OK, but LOTR is beyond it. Prince Caspian can't even see LOTR because it's so far beyond him. Lord of the Rings trilogy vs Prince Caspian?
I see that many of the people here seem to like the LOTR trilogy much more than Prince Caspian. I, on the other hand, liked Prince Caspian more. I'm not saying that LOTR is bad, because it probably comes in on #2; it's just a little bit more for, well, ';older audiences'; whereas Prince Caspian has managed to keep a PG-rating.
Now, comparing a masterpiece trilogy that's been out for several years and that's seen world-wide to one movie of the (hopefully) seven Narnia movies (that aren't even near-done) that has been out for over half a year now probably will result in the answers that have already been given. LOTR is definately a great Trilogy, but Prince Caspian has clearly left many audiences in awe as well :)
Honestly, it's not a comparison. The scope of LotR was just so huge in comparison. That's not to say Prince Caspian wasn't really good...
That's like how so many people compared LotR to Harry Potter (and Harry Potter to the Narnia books and now Harry Potter to Twilight). None of these movies can really be compared. Sure, they're all set in a fantastical world with battles of good v. evil or what have you (this excludes Twilight...haven't seen it so don't include it any further remarks I'm making, lol) but the stories are so completely different and the characters are all unique. You can't compare Frodo to Harry or Harry to Caspian or Sauron to Voldemort or Aslan to Dumbledore. It's just not that simple. I think a person (like me) can be a huge fan off all of these series. I've read the Narnia books and the Harry Potter series and loved both. Harry Potter was more for me because when I'm reading a good book, I don't want it to end and the lenth of the last four were pure heaven. But that's beside the point.
A more even comparison would be...Deep Impact to Armageddon (seriously, it was SO similiar!).
Two masterpieces but aimed to different people/public. Lord of the Rings is directed to adults or general public while Chronicles of Narnia is for children. As a work for adults the books of LOTR are longer, with more characters, more complex plot.
Though Prince Caspian, together with the rest of the Narnia series is quite easy to follow and rather interesting, it simply cannot compare to the LotR trilogy. The LotR trilogy is a lot better, with a much larger fanbase as well.
LORD OF THE RINGS is in a different league than CRONICLES OF NARNIA, PRINCE CASPIAN etc..............
3 fantastic series of books and movies are:
LORD OF THE RINGS,
NARNIA,
HARRY POTTER....................
**********ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC*********
I actually like the Narnia movie's a lot better. I could never get into the Lord Of The Rings at all. Narnia was a lot easier to follow.
I love The Chronicles of Narnia series and Prince Caspian was amazing. I'm not much of a Lord of the Rings fan, though so I can't really compare.
Lord Of The Rings Trilogy are a complete masterpiece, they don't even compare to Narnia.
I am insulted just by you asking that question. Shame on you to even think of comparing The Lord of the Rings with that puny movie...
Lord of the Rings no hesitation
Lord of the rings rules ok.
lord of the rings hands down!!
narnia doesn't even come close.
you are so dumb they dont even compare
No comments:
Post a Comment